IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Beauvais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-10-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 60 4 16 20 0.333 0.1238 0.1375 0.3529 0.3918
2012-13 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 56 7 27 34 0.607 0.2254 0.2389 0.6428 0.6814
2013-14 Penticton Vees BCHL 57 13 45 58 1.018 0.3960 0.3957 1.4838 1.4827
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 28 2 6 8 0.286
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 39 1 5 6 0.154
2014-15 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 34 1 5 6 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2014-15 · Bemidji State
-43.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1770
Defenseman overall
#494
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Nate Repensky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Yale (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.