IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Ripley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-04-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Dawson Creek Rage NAHL 56 2 11 13 0.232 0.0853 0.0925 0.2450 0.2656
2012-13 Powell River Kings BCHL 46 2 11 13 0.283 0.1089 0.1110 0.4113 0.4193
2013-14 Powell River Kings BCHL 29 0 8 8 0.276 0.1063 0.1034 0.4015 0.3907
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 38 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 37 1 6 7 0.189
2014-15 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 42 2 6 8 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2014-15 · Notre Dame
+89.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16847
Defenseman overall
#1892
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Campbell
Skidmore · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Paul
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Parks
Gustavus Adolphus · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.