IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Sarmiento Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-09-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cornwall Colts CCHL 60 6 23 29 0.483 0.1543 0.1512 0.3741 0.3666
2011-12 Jamestown Ironmen NAHL 31 3 8 11 0.355 0.1406 0.1345 0.3725 0.3563
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 25 3 11 14 0.560
2014-15 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 27 3 11 14 0.518
2013-14 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 24 13 16 29 1.208
2012-13 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 27 3 7 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2012-13 · Johnson & Wales
+206.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40405
Forward overall
#1410
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Kangas
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan McNeill
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Donnie Hallmark
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.