IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Bruneteau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 38 2 6 8 0.210 0.0773 0.0805 0.2225 0.2316
2012-13 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 41 1 11 12 0.293 0.1075 0.1065 0.3094 0.3066
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 45 13 10 23 0.511 0.1878 0.1767 0.5402 0.5081
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 29 9 5 14 0.483
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2014-15 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 22 5 5 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2014-15 · Hamilton
+257.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37279
Forward overall
#1311
Forward born in 1993
#3833
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Guiney
Concordia · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Michalchuk
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Facchini
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.