IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Davidson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 50 1 7 8 0.160 0.0588 0.0607 0.1689 0.1743
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 59 5 22 27 0.458 0.1681 0.1650 0.4830 0.4742
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 59 7 10 17 0.288 0.1058 0.0986 0.3041 0.2833
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Neumann D3 MAC — 27 8 18 26 0.963
2016-17 Neumann D3 MAC — 26 2 12 14 0.538
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC — 27 2 12 14 0.518
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC — 15 1 3 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2014-15 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+125.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13445
Defenseman overall
#1516
Defenseman born in 1993
#4462
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady O'Connor
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Morley Phillips
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Timothy Baylis
Southern New Hampshire · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.