IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Donohue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Minot Minotauros NAHL 46 3 4 7 0.152 0.0559 0.0575 0.1606 0.1653
2012-13 Minot Minotauros NAHL 44 13 9 22 0.500 0.1837 0.1798 0.5278 0.5166
2013-14 Minot Minotauros NAHL 51 10 9 19 0.372 0.1369 0.1271 0.3932 0.3651
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 23 5 4 9 0.391
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 24 5 3 8 0.333
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 24 0 9 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · Gustavus Adolphus
+195.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37518
Forward overall
#1341
Forward born in 1993
#3886
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilson Farrow
Williams · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Vierling
Wisconsin-Stout · 2010-11
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Bodami
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.