IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Long Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-11-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Soo Eagles NOJHL 26 6 10 16 0.615 0.1038 0.1041 0.2557 0.2564
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0619 0.0596 0.1765 0.1699
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Fredonia D3 — SR 20 4 9 13 0.650
2015-16 Fredonia D3 — JR 23 4 10 14 0.609
2014-15 Fredonia D3 — SO 21 4 6 10 0.476
2013-14 Fredonia D3 — FR 19 3 9 12 0.632
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2013-14 · Fredonia
+852.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43535
Forward overall
#1773
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Devlin
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Shaheen
Hobart · 2014-15
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Fouts
New England College · 2000-01
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.