IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Shaheen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 43 12 15 27 0.628 0.1347 0.1369 0.3075 0.3125
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 24 2 5 7 0.292 0.0876 0.0857 0.2403 0.2352
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2017-18 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 24 4 7 11 0.458
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 19 4 5 9 0.474
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 19 4 7 11 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2015-16 · Hobart
+536.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31384
Forward overall
#1295
Forward born in 1994
#691
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevie Bryant
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Gilreath
Amherst · 2015-16
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Wolfe
Salem State · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.