IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Gilreath Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-11-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 West Bend Power NA3HL 44 11 33 44 1.000 0.1205 0.1208 0.3159 0.3166
2015-16 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 2 22 24 0.429 0.1591 0.1536 0.4538 0.4382
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2018-19 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2017-18 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 19 2 3 5 0.263
2016-17 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 24 2 11 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2016-17 · Amherst
+308.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7636
Defenseman overall
#1185
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Blake
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Webb
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.