IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Ledford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 58 9 26 35 0.603 0.2240 0.2320 0.6389 0.6617
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 60 9 31 40 0.667 0.2475 0.2439 0.7059 0.6957
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA SR 30 6 18 24 0.800
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA JR 41 7 15 22 0.537
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA SO 37 7 20 27 0.730
2014-15 Air Force D1 AHA FR 41 2 16 18 0.439
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2014-15 · Air Force
+114.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15897
Forward overall
#654
Forward born in 1994
#1223
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Mueller
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Caprio
Becker · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2009-10
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.