IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Hetz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 56 13 12 25 0.446 0.1657 0.1729 0.4726 0.4932
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 17 14 31 0.544 0.2020 0.2007 0.5759 0.5722
2014-15 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 60 28 35 63 1.050 0.3899 0.3669 1.1117 1.0462
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 28 3 2 5 0.179
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2016-17 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 25 0 5 5 0.200
2015-16 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 28 3 3 6 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2015-16 · Ferris State
-16.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12070
Forward overall
#497
Forward born in 1994
#687
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell McPherson
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian DeLong
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.