IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eddie Matsushima Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 8 11 19 0.339 0.1260 0.1285 0.3593 0.3665
2013-14 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 54 11 21 32 0.593 0.2200 0.2134 0.6274 0.6085
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 57 14 14 28 0.491 0.1824 0.1673 0.5201 0.4771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 28 14 17 31 1.107
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 26 14 14 28 1.077
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 27 4 6 10 0.370
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 28 6 9 15 0.536
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2015-16 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+236.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22697
Forward overall
#912
Forward born in 1994
#2347
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Quagliata
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Batis
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.