IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake McCann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Minot Minotauros NAHL 52 5 8 13 0.250 0.0919 0.0915 0.2639 0.2626
2013-14 Minot Minotauros NAHL 59 12 12 24 0.407 0.1495 0.1413 0.4294 0.4058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 28 6 5 11 0.393
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 25 4 5 9 0.360
2014-15 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 15 1 3 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2014-15 · Gustavus Adolphus
+156.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39163
Forward overall
#1419
Forward born in 1993
#4123
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnathon Mead
Lake Forest · 2023-24
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Gauld
Concordia · 2014-15
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Bourne
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.