IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Flicker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-10-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.0816 0.0823 0.2345 0.2365
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 5 12 17 0.293 0.1077 0.1032 0.3094 0.2965
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC — 25 1 0 1 0.040
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC — 23 3 4 7 0.304
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2014-15 · Saint John's
+11.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43115
Forward overall
#1584
Forward born in 1993
#4714
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robb Haider
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Donaldson
Johnson & Wales · 2013-14
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Patton
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.