← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roman Pfennings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-21 Country: Germany
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Düsseldorfer EG U18 DNL 29 0 3 3 0.103 0.0160 0.0168 0.0664 0.0697
2009-10 Jungadler Mannheim U18 DNL 34 4 9 13 0.382 0.0590 0.0603 0.2455 0.2511
2010-11 Jungadler Mannheim U18 DNL 36 15 14 29 0.806 0.1244 0.1257 0.5171 0.5226
2011-12 Jungadler Mannheim U18 DNL 36 8 19 27 0.750 0.1158 0.1119 0.4814 0.4650
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0919 0.0905 0.2639 0.2599
2013-14 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 43 8 7 15 0.349 0.0806 0.0757 0.1707 0.1603
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 25 8 10 18 0.720
2014-15 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 23 1 8 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2014-15 · Westfield State
+459.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42615
Forward overall
#1565
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2022-23
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.