IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Romzek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Rockland Nationals CCHL 47 2 10 12 0.255 0.0729 0.0754 0.1976 0.2043
2013-14 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 55 11 8 19 0.345 0.1283 0.1290 0.3658 0.3677
2014-15 Keystone Ice Miners NAHL 60 16 13 29 0.483 0.1794 0.1709 0.5117 0.4876
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 22 4 7 11 0.500
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2016-17 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 25 7 10 17 0.680
2015-16 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 21 5 3 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2015-16 · Nazareth
+188.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29751
Forward overall
#1221
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Wendorf
Hamline · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Beauvais
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Liley
Northland · 2009-10
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.