← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Hutchison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Chicago Steel USHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2949 0.3122 1.5017 1.5898
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 22 2 8 10 0.455 0.1751 0.1797 0.6614 0.6788
2019-20 Penticton Vees BCHL 58 6 36 42 0.724 0.2790 0.2790 1.0538 1.0538
2020-21 Tri-City Storm USHL 33 3 11 14 0.424 0.2502 0.2502 1.2740 1.2740
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Miami D1 NCHC 33 2 7 9 0.273
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 AHA GR 14 1 4 5 0.357
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 34 3 17 20 0.588
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Vermont
-24.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4841
Defenseman overall
#1039
Defenseman born in 2000
#2184
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.