IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Niko Coffman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 40 2 10 12 0.300 0.1102 0.1139 0.3167 0.3272
2014-15 Keystone Ice Miners NAHL 57 1 9 10 0.175 0.0644 0.0632 0.1851 0.1816
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 6 17 23 0.469 0.1725 0.1616 0.4955 0.4641
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Adrian D1 NCHA SR 22 0 2 2 0.091
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA — 22 0 2 2 0.091
2018-19 Adrian D1 NCHA JR 26 0 4 4 0.154
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA — 26 0 4 4 0.154
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA — 12 0 2 2 0.167
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA — 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12347
Defenseman overall
#1651
Defenseman born in 1995
#4170
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Stevens
Plymouth State · 2008-09
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Ott
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Charlie Smith
Chatham · 2024-25
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.