IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack McDonald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brockville Braves CCHL 39 8 24 32 0.821 0.2342 0.2383 0.6351 0.6462
2022-23 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 57 15 24 39 0.684 0.2540 0.2519 0.7244 0.7184
2023-24 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 60 12 31 43 0.717 0.2661 0.2512 0.7588 0.7163
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 26 5 8 13 0.500
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 23 6 9 15 0.652
2016-17 Skidmore D3 — — 0 251 2430 2681 0.000
2015-16 Skidmore D3 — — 0 213 2066 2279 0.000
2014-15 Skidmore D3 — — 0 150 1397 1547 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14091
Forward overall
#523
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Leonard
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.