IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-07-07 Country: USA
2018 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #71  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1229 0.1307 0.5892 0.6266
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 39 5 15 20 0.513
2020-21 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 19 6 13 19 1.000
2019-20 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 33 3 18 21 0.636
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 39 1 12 13 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2018-19 · Northeastern
+170.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ken McLean
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2004-05
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Weber
Aurora · 2017-18
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.