← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Suede Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 2 2 0 2 1.000 0.3962 0.4375 1.0499 1.1593
2018-19 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0615 0.0628 0.2946 0.3009
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 33 3 2 5 0.151 0.0931 0.0931 0.4463 0.4463
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 46 15 14 29 0.630 0.2498 0.2498 0.6619 0.6619
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 28 11 21 32 1.143
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 32 12 22 34 1.062
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 28 7 11 18 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2022-23 · Adrian
+253.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35362
Forward overall
#1849
Forward born in 2000
#3576
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2006-07
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.