IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Bond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New York Bobcats EHL 9 1 5 6 0.667 0.1540 0.1676 0.3262 0.3550
2014-15 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 36 3 5 8 0.222 0.0569 0.0587 0.1675 0.1727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC — 23 5 1 6 0.261
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 CCHA — 4 4 0 4 1.000
2019-20 Hamline D1 MIAC FR 24 11 12 23 0.958
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC — 24 11 12 23 0.958
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2019-20 · Hamline
+995.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#53915
Forward overall
#2577
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

T.J. Cooper
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Jorgenson
Gustavus Adolphus · 2019-20
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Gilleshammer
Concordia · 2019-20
0.115 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.