IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Cooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 44 10 13 23 0.523 0.1281 0.1259 0.3578 0.3517
2003-04 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 43 9 7 16 0.372 0.0912 0.0855 0.2547 0.2389
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 29 9 8 17 0.586
2006-07 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 25 7 2 9 0.360
2005-06 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 14 2 1 3 0.214
2004-05 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 27 5 4 9 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2004-05 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+283.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40310
Forward overall
#1154
Forward born in 1984
#2610
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake O'Neill
Elmira · 2013-14
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2015-16
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Papayoanou
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.