IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Gilleshammer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grafton/Park River (N.D.) USHS-MN 4 3 3 6 1.500 0.1899 0.1899 0.3644 0.3644
2020-21 Sheridan Hawks NA3HL 39 16 17 33 0.846 0.1062 0.1062 0.2671 0.2671
2021-22 — NA3HL 47 19 30 49 1.043 0.1308 0.1229 0.3291 0.3092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 26 1 2 3 0.115
2022-23 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Concordia
-9.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25277
Forward overall
#1272
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tony DuFour
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
0.606 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.