IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tony DuFour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-08-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Dauphin Kings MJHL 39 6 17 23 0.590 0.1668 0.1641 0.3716 0.3657
2001-02 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 60 13 18 31 0.517 0.2011 0.1854 0.7535 0.6946
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 18 1 2 3 0.167
2003-04 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 31 4 13 17 0.548
2002-03 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 33 5 15 20 0.606
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2002-03 · SUNY Oswego
+262.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8881
Defenseman overall
#728
Defenseman born in 1981

D1 Comparables

Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Keizer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.