IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Pelkey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 41 3 4 7 0.171 0.0606 0.0570 0.1801 0.1694
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 24 3 4 7 0.292
2016-17 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 18 2 5 7 0.389
2015-16 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 26 6 5 11 0.423
2014-15 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 25 7 5 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2014-15 · Skidmore
+792.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22679
Defenseman overall
#2061
Defenseman born in 1993
#6197
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zander Latreille
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Wall
Trine · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricardo Yesue
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.