← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Stang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 48 3 2 5 0.104 0.0370 0.0381 0.1099 0.1132
2014-15 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 23 14 26 40 1.739 0.1296 0.1267
2015-16 Mason City Toros NA3HL 38 10 26 36 0.947 0.1048 0.0966 0.2991 0.2756
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SR 25 3 24 27 1.080
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 25 3 24 27 1.080
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC JR 27 4 14 18 0.667
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 27 4 14 18 0.667
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 25 7 8 15 0.600
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2016-17 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+53.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24070
Forward overall
#922
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.