IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrison Sanipass Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 40 1 2 3 0.075 0.0266 0.0267 0.0787 0.0789
2014-15 — NAHL 56 13 10 23 0.411 0.1459 0.1386 0.4312 0.4096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UMass Boston D1 NEHC SR 28 9 9 18 0.643
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 28 9 9 18 0.643
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 27 11 6 17 0.630
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 31 9 13 22 0.710
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2015-16 · UMass Boston
+783.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44895
Forward overall
#1819
Forward born in 1994
#5006
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bonfield
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Payne
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Sabin
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.