← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bonfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Kemptville 73's CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Kemptville 73's CCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 50 16 18 34 0.680 0.1475 0.1475 0.5261 0.5261
2020-21 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 CCHL 55 33 26 59 1.073 0.2327 0.2177 0.8299 0.7764
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 13 6 3 9 0.692
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 21 2 6 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+104.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16941
Forward overall
#800
Forward born in 2001
#238
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.