IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Delisle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 34 9 8 17 0.500 0.1155 0.1152 0.2447 0.2441
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Trinity D1 NESCAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 3 3 2 5 1.667
2015-16 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · Trinity
+238.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32513
Forward overall
#1318
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Taff
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Isaac Barrett
Utica · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Amatto
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.