IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Barrett Brooks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Omaha Lancers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1280 0.6007 0.6514
2019-20 Austin Bruins NAHL 44 8 11 19 0.432 0.1586 0.1586 0.4558 0.4558
2020-21 Austin Bruins NAHL 56 22 17 39 0.696 0.2559 0.2559 0.7351 0.7351
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 61 7 9 16 0.262 0.1547 0.1445 0.7878 0.7357
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 34 3 1 4 0.118
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 26 2 6 8 0.308
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 27 4 6 10 0.370
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28095
Forward overall
#1457
Forward born in 2001
#2660
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Farley
Utica · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Ruberto
Hamilton · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Serre
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.