IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Lyons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 25 8 15 23 0.920 0.1850 0.1850 0.4207 0.4207
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 12 2 1 3 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Harvard D1 ECAC SR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2023-24 Harvard D1 ECAC JR 29 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 14 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22493
Forward overall
#1052
Forward born in 2000
#2371
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Payne
Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Fitzpatrick
Marian · 2005-06
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tamás Tóth
Hobart · 2021-22
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.