← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Payne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 BCHL 32 15 13 28 0.875 0.3406 0.3549 1.2760 1.3294
2007-08 BCHL 38 7 14 21 0.553 0.2151 0.2125 0.8059 0.7962
2008-09 BCHL 54 13 17 30 0.556 0.2162 0.2045 0.8102 0.7664
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2011-12 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 25 3 10 13 0.520
2010-11 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 23 9 7 16 0.696
2009-10 Concordia D3 FR 25 1 11 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2009-10 · Concordia
+170.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15209
Forward overall
#660
Forward born in 1988
#1303
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.