← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Payne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 BCHL 32 15 13 28 0.875 0.3371 0.3512 1.2734 1.3267
2007-08 BCHL 38 7 14 21 0.553 0.2129 0.2103 0.8042 0.7945
2008-09 BCHL 54 13 17 30 0.556 0.2141 0.2025 0.8086 0.7649
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2011-12 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 25 3 10 13 0.520
2010-11 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 23 9 7 16 0.696
2009-10 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 1 11 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2009-10 · Concordia
+172.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23544
Forward overall
#825
Forward born in 1988
#1216
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.