← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Ramage Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 2 6 8 0.210 0.0591 0.0590 0.1731 0.1729
2016-17 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 45 4 22 26 0.578 0.1622 0.1541 0.4751 0.4514
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC JR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 25 4 3 7 0.280
2018-19 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 31 0 6 6 0.194
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 31 0 6 6 0.194
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 7 0 1 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · Manhattanville
+30.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14274
Defenseman overall
#1901
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.