IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 21 2 2 4 0.191 0.0755 0.0726 0.2000 0.1922
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fredonia D1 — SR 27 10 6 16 0.593
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SR 27 10 6 16 0.593
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — JR 26 7 10 17 0.654
2016-17 Fredonia D3 — SO 24 9 18 27 1.125
2015-16 Fredonia D3 — FR 21 9 7 16 0.762
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2015-16 · Fredonia
+1126.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#51918
Forward overall
#2185
Forward born in 1994
#6070
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Cozine
St. Thomas · 2001-02
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Anzai
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Aksoy
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.