IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Lupo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 8 6 14 0.237 0.0872 0.0879 0.2505 0.2524
2015-16 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 60 5 16 21 0.350 0.1286 0.1239 0.3694 0.3559
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Amherst D1 NESCAC SR 24 6 8 14 0.583
2019-20 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 24 6 8 14 0.583
2018-19 Amherst D1 NESCAC JR 25 11 13 24 0.960
2018-19 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 25 11 13 24 0.960
2017-18 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 25 8 7 15 0.600
2016-17 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 24 4 7 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · Amherst
+389.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42252
Forward overall
#1791
Forward born in 1995
#4578
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tristan Boyer
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
David DuBord
St. Thomas · 2000-01
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Breyden Zupsansky
Chatham · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.