IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Abitibi Eskimos NOJHL 49 12 30 42 0.857 0.1221 0.1265 0.3556 0.3685
2014-15 — NAHL 35 3 7 10 0.286 0.1015 0.1007 0.3000 0.2978
2015-16 Timmins Rock NOJHL 23 5 8 13 0.565 0.0805 0.0749 0.2345 0.2182
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Western New England D1 — SR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE SR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2018-19 Western New England D1 — JR 18 5 6 11 0.611
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE JR 18 5 6 11 0.611
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE SO 26 3 2 5 0.192
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE FR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2006-07 SUNY Morrisville D3 — JR 12 1 1 2 0.167

NCAAe Rankings

#46351
Forward overall
#2002
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael McIntosh
Amherst · 2003-04
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paolo Dipasquale
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Kirwin
Albertus Magnus · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.