IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Klishko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 3 7 10 0.208 0.0773 0.0821 0.2205 0.2342
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 16 0 3 3 0.188 0.0696 0.0709 0.1985 0.2021
2016-17 — NAHL 32 2 8 10 0.312 0.1160 0.1118 0.3309 0.3189
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 26 6 13 19 0.731
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 15 0 4 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
+226.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35696
Forward overall
#1598
Forward born in 1996
#4519
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Jewett
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Litchke
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Manoukian
Endicott · 2018-19
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.