← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Klishko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 3 7 10 0.208 0.0765 0.0813 0.2199 0.2336
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 16 0 3 3 0.188 0.0689 0.0701 0.1979 0.2015
2016-17 NAHL 32 2 8 10 0.312 0.1148 0.1106 0.3298 0.3178
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 25 7 13 20 0.800
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC JR 26 6 13 19 0.731
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 26 6 13 19 0.731
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC SO 16 1 2 3 0.188
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 15 0 4 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
+230.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36056
Forward overall
#1553
Forward born in 1996
#3653
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.