IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Solow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NAHL 27 2 3 5 0.185 0.0680 0.0710 0.1957 0.2043
2015-16 — NAHL 33 4 14 18 0.545 0.2004 0.2004 0.5765 0.5764
2016-17 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 33 7 20 27 0.818 0.3006 0.2842 0.8648 0.8177
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Oswego D1 — SR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2018-19 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Oswego D1 — JR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2017-18 Merrimack D1 NE10 — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4699
Defenseman overall
#884
Defenseman born in 1996
#1578
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Simons
Endicott · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Soik
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2006-07
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2017-18
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.