IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Solomon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-11-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 26 2 0 2 0.077 0.0283 0.0300 0.0812 0.0861
2015-16 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 48 3 12 15 0.312 0.1148 0.1166 0.3298 0.3350
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 58 9 22 31 0.534 0.1964 0.1888 0.5642 0.5424
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wilkes D1 MAC SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2019-20 Wilkes D1 MAC JR 28 1 4 5 0.179
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wilkes D1 MAC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11337
Defenseman overall
#1643
Defenseman born in 1996
#3926
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erik Cooper
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Casale
Salem State · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Decker
Norwich · 2002-03
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.