← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Jestadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1238 0.1284 0.3529 0.3660
2015-16 Soo Eagles NOJHL 17 1 2 3 0.176 0.0298 0.0291 0.0733 0.0715
2016-17 Dells Ducks USPHL-Elite 35 13 16 29 0.829 0.0993 0.0926 0.1902 0.1774
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Finlandia D3 FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#45982
Forward overall
#2142
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.