| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.333 | 0.1238 | 0.1284 | 0.3529 | 0.3660 |
| 2015-16 | Soo Eagles | NOJHL | 17 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.176 | 0.0298 | 0.0291 | 0.0733 | 0.0715 |
| 2016-17 | Dells Ducks | USPHL-Elite | 35 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 0.829 | 0.0993 | 0.0926 | 0.1902 | 0.1774 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Finlandia | D3 | — | FR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.