← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Jestadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1225 0.1271 0.3518 0.3649
2015-16 Soo Eagles NOJHL 17 1 2 3 0.176 0.0295 0.0288 0.0735 0.0717
2016-17 Dells Ducks USPHL-Elite 35 13 16 29 0.829 0.0765 0.0714 0.1897 0.1769
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Finlandia D3 FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#46201
Forward overall
#2105
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.