IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Pezza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 1 5 6 0.167 0.0501 0.0505 0.1373 0.1384
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 11 15 26 0.591 0.1774 0.1702 0.4867 0.4670
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 5 1 2 3 0.600
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 24 5 1 6 0.250
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 20 4 2 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2017-18 · Connecticut College
+186.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32438
Forward overall
#1436
Forward born in 1996
#191
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Pelton
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Huppert
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack McDonald
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.