IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Pezza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 36 1 5 6 0.167 0.0468 0.0472 0.1371 0.1382
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 11 15 26 0.591 0.1659 0.1592 0.4858 0.4661
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 5 1 2 3 0.600
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 24 5 1 6 0.250
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 20 4 2 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2017-18 · Connecticut College
+206.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43342
Forward overall
#1939
Forward born in 1996
#202
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Huppert
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Pelton
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Roberts
Utica · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.