IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Huppert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 53 13 21 34 0.641 0.2357 0.2338 0.6771 0.6717
2010-11 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 50 13 29 42 0.840 0.3086 0.2904 0.8866 0.8344
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 27 9 12 21 0.778
2012-13 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 25 5 11 16 0.640
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 27 5 10 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2011-12 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+142.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15620
Forward overall
#621
Forward born in 1990
#778
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Morton
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Foley
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Becker
Utica · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.