IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Kreuser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 32 2 7 9 0.281 0.0650 0.0638 — —
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 38 10 10 20 0.526 0.1216 0.1141 0.2575 0.2416
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Suffolk D1 CNE SR 17 3 6 9 0.529
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE — 17 3 6 9 0.529
2018-19 Suffolk D1 CNE JR 17 2 0 2 0.118
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE — 17 2 0 2 0.118
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 7 0 1 1 0.143
2016-17 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 16 2 1 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2016-17 · Nazareth
+133.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37108
Forward overall
#1522
Forward born in 1995
#1392
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Schwindt
Elmira · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabe Randel
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Connolly
Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.719 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.