← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryder Donovan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-04 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #110  ·  Vegas Golden Knights Vegas Golden Knights
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Duluth East High USHS-MN 21 1 2 3 0.143 0.0385 0.0435 0.0347 0.0392
2017-18 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0683 0.0699 0.3273 0.3352
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 34 2 2 4 0.118
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 22 2 1 3 0.136
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 32 2 3 5 0.156
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2019-20 · Wisconsin
+196.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#59773
Forward overall
#3780
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.