IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dom Garcia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 49 14 13 27 0.551 0.2024 0.2053 0.5824 0.5906
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 56 14 33 47 0.839 0.3084 0.2960 0.8871 0.8514
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 24 2 0 2 0.083
2019-20 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 29 0 4 4 0.138
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 35 2 6 8 0.229
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 33 2 2 4 0.121
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2017-18 · Arizona State
-45.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17391
Forward overall
#676
Forward born in 1996
#961
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Warfield
Daniel Webster · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Fitzpatrick
Marian · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2014-15
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.