| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | New Jersey Jr. Titans | EHL | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | New Jersey Jr. Titans | EHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights | NAHL | 29 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.241 | 0.0956 | 0.0934 | 0.2534 | 0.2475 |
| 2016-17 | Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights | NAHL | 50 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 0.280 | 0.1109 | 0.1023 | 0.2940 | 0.2712 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | SR | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.100 |
| 2019-20 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | JR | 12 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.250 |
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | SO | 10 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.400 |
| 2017-18 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | FR | 29 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.379 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.