IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Preston Weeks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 11 0 2 2 0.182 0.0668 0.0759 0.1919 0.2179
2016-17 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 54 1 8 9 0.167 0.0612 0.0662 0.1760 0.1903
2017-18 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 59 0 5 5 0.085 0.0311 0.0321 0.0894 0.0922
2018-19 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 59 3 8 11 0.186 0.0685 0.0676 0.1967 0.1941
2019-20 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 50 5 13 18 0.360 0.1323 0.1323 0.3800 0.3800
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17499
Defenseman overall
#2765
Defenseman born in 1999
#5374
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Husted
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Charron
Skidmore · 2017-18
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Schiavone
Nichols · 2009-10
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.