IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Schiavone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Manitoulin Islanders NOJHL 50 20 24 44 0.880 0.1470 0.1439 0.3663 0.3587
2010-11 Manitoulin Islanders NOJHL 46 19 15 34 0.739 0.1234 0.1143 0.3077 0.2850
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Nichols D3 CNE SR 24 3 2 5 0.208
2013-14 Nichols D3 CNE JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2012-13 Nichols D3 CNE SO 18 1 0 1 0.056
2011-12 Nichols D3 CNE FR 18 2 2 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2011-12 · Nichols
+105.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30038
Forward overall
#1098
Forward born in 1990
#349
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Inderieden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady O'Connor
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.