IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Inderieden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Southern Minnesota Express NAHL 59 20 22 42 0.712 0.2643 0.2703 0.7538 0.7710
2007-08 Southern Minnesota Express NAHL 58 16 20 36 0.621 0.2305 0.2244 0.6572 0.6398
2008-09 — NAHL 50 19 21 40 0.800 0.2970 0.2744 0.8470 0.7826
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — JR 16 3 0 3 0.188
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SO 20 6 5 11 0.550
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 28 9 1 10 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2009-10 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+60.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12941
Forward overall
#585
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.